Astroloba cremnophila van Jaarsv.
Cliff Astroloba
Every figure on this page is derived from public data by a stated rule and says its source; nothing here is written by a person or a model, except the Wikipedia passage, which is quoted and marked as such. How it is made.
Summary
Astroloba cremnophila is a plant that is endemic to the Western Cape. It grows on cliffs in the western part of the Great Swartberg.
Text from Wikipedia, “Astroloba cremnophila”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written. Kept separate from everything derived here.
About the genus · Astroloba
Astroloba is a genus of flowering plants in the family Asphodelaceae, subfamily Asphodeloideae, native to the Cape Province of South Africa.
Text from Wikipedia, “Astroloba”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written.
Cultivation
Grouped as a cactus or succulent by the genus Astroloba, which is reliably one kind of plant (archetype table). The table holds no figure for this group, which spans too much for one minimum, and no habitat climate is derived yet; no cold floor is given, and no prose comes from the table.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Papers naming this species
Works whose title or abstract names Astroloba cremnophila, most cited first, from OpenAlex (CC0). A mention, not a cultivation source: nothing on this page is drawn from them.
Related
Other Astroloba 11 in the reference
Astroloba bullulata Roggeveld Astroloba
Astroloba congesta Eastern Astroloba
Astroloba corrugata Bumpy Astroloba
Astroloba foliolosa Camdaboo Astroloba
Astroloba herrei Swartberg Astroloba
Astroloba pentagona Asphodelaceae
Astroloba robusta Robust Starlobe
Astroloba rubriflora Robertson Astroloba
Astroloba spiralis Kleinkaroo Astroloba
Astroloba spirella Asphodelaceae Astroloba tenax Glossy Astroloba History & registers
Where this page came from built 2026-09-20 · dossier v2 · node
gbif.species answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.synonyms answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.vernacular answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)wcvp.distribution answeredgbif.occurrences answeredGBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.3h4zamclimate nothing to reportwikidata answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)wikipedia answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skippedinat.taxon not askedcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive)inat.photos.wild nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)inat.photos.cultivated nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)commons nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)gbif.media did not answerapi.gbif.org not asked: offline re-derivationopenalex answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skippedEvery upstream is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, or refused. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 2 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.