Species
⟳ +
Ceropegia juttae Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, CC BY, via GBIF · observed growing wild

Ceropegia juttae (Dinter) Bruyns

Apocynaceae

No habitat climate 2 photographs Cactus or succulent
Add one to my plants Sow seed

Every figure on this page is derived from public data by a stated rule and says its source; nothing here is written by a person or a model, except the Wikipedia passage, which is quoted and marked as such. How it is made.

About the genus · Ceropegia

Ceropegia is a genus of plants within the family Apocynaceae, native to Africa, southern Asia, and Australia. It was named by Carl Linnaeus, who first described this genus in his Genera plantarum, which appeared in 1737. Linnaeus referred to the description and picture of a plant in the Horti Malabarici as the plant for which the genus was created. More on Wikipedia ›

The opening of Wikipedia, “Ceropegia”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written.

Family
Apocynaceae
Described by
(Dinter) Bruyns
Native to
not verified
Wild records
2 in range· 2 open

Also known as Gonostemon similis var. portei-taurinii (Dinter & A.Berger) P.V.Heath; Hoodia bainii var. juttae (Dinter) H.Huber; Hoodia juttae Dinter; Stapelia portei-taurinae Dinter & A.Berger; Stapelia porteitaurinii Dinter & A.Berger.

Cultivation

Grouped as a cactus or succulent by the genus Ceropegia, which is reliably one kind of plant (archetype table). The table holds no figure for this group, which spans too much for one minimum, and no habitat climate is derived yet; no cold floor is given, and no prose comes from the table.

Nothing derived: no habitat climate for this species, and the archetype table has no figure for its genus or family.

Climate across the habitat

No habitat climate can be derived: Native range not verified: WCVP lists Ceropegia juttae more than once and the backbone's authorship ((Dinter) Bruyns) matches neither.

Natural habitat

Native range as published by WCVP.
Openly licensed records inside the range, framed on where they fall.
NativeDistribution source did not answer.
Name not resolvedWCVP lists Ceropegia juttae more than once and the backbone's authorship ((Dinter) Bruyns) matches neither· WCVP lists this name more than once and authorship did not decide, so no range is attached and nothing is derived from records
Evidence usedNo verified native range for this name: WCVP has no entry with native status, and a checklist that only reports presence cannot tell a wild record from a garden one. The map shows 2 openly licensed records untested against any range; no map marker or climate is derived from them, and no sheet is built from them.

Photographs

Ceropegia juttae

Photographs: Herbarium of the University of Coimbra, Portugal (COI), CC BY, via GBIF.

Papers naming this species

Works whose title or abstract names Ceropegia juttae, most cited first, from OpenAlex (CC0). A mention, not a cultivation source: nothing on this page is drawn from them.

Occurrence Download
GBIF.Org User (2023) · Global Biodiversity Information Facility
Occurrence Download
GBIF.Org User (2023) · Global Biodiversity Information Facility

Other Ceropegia 699 in the reference

Ceropegia abayensis Apocynaceae Ceropegia abyssinica Apocynaceae Ceropegia achtenii Apocynaceae
Ceropegia acicularis Apocynaceae Ceropegia acutiloba Apocynaceae
Ceropegia adamsiana Apocynaceae Ceropegia adscendens Apocynaceae Ceropegia affinis Apocynaceae Ceropegia africana Apocynaceae
Ceropegia ahmarensis Apocynaceae Ceropegia albipilosa Apocynaceae Ceropegia albisepta Apocynaceae all 700 ›

History & registers

GBIFPOWOIPNIWikidata
Where this page came from built 2026-09-20 · dossier v2 · node
gbif.species answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)
gbif.synonyms answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)
gbif.vernacular answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)
wcvp.distribution answered
gbif.occurrences answeredGBIF occurrence search API
climate nothing to report
wikidata answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)
wikipedia nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skipped
inat.taxon nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)
inat.photos.wild nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: no iNaturalist taxon of exactly this name
inat.photos.cultivated nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)
commons nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-20 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)
gbif.media answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skipped
openalex answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-20; this build: skipped

Every upstream is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, or refused. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 1 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.