Stenocactus sulphureus (A.Dietr.) Bravo
Cactaceae
Every figure on this page is derived from public data by a stated rule and says its source; nothing here is written by a person or a model, except the Wikipedia passage, which is quoted and marked as such. How it is made.
About the genus · Stenocactus
Stenocactus is a genus of cacti in the Cactaceae family.
Text from Wikipedia, “Stenocactus”, CC BY-SA 4.0, quoted as written.
Also known as Brittonrosea gladiata (Otto & Link) Speg.; Echinocactus gladiatus Link & Otto; Echinocactus sulphureus A.Dietr.; Echinofossulocactus gladiatus (Link & Otto) Lawr.; Echinofossulocactus sulphureus (A.Dietr.) J.Meyrán and 5 more.
Cultivation
Grouped as a cactus or succulent by Cactaceae, which is usually but not always one kind of plant (archetype table). The table holds no figure for this group, which spans too much for one minimum, and no habitat climate is derived yet; no cold floor is given, and no prose comes from the table.
Climate across the habitat
Natural habitat
Papers naming this species
Works whose title or abstract names Stenocactus sulphureus, most cited first, from OpenAlex (CC0). A mention, not a cultivation source: nothing on this page is drawn from them.
Related
Other Stenocactus 8 in the reference
Stenocactus coptonogonus Cactaceae
Stenocactus crispatus Cactaceae
Stenocactus multicostatus Cactaceae
Stenocactus obvallatus Cactaceae Stenocactus ochoterenanus Cactaceae
Stenocactus phyllacanthus Cactaceae Stenocactus vaupelianus Cactaceae History & registers
Where this page came from built 2026-09-20 · dossier v2 · node
gbif.species answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.synonyms answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)gbif.vernacular answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (offline re-derivation; the backbone was not asked)wcvp.distribution answeredgbif.occurrences answeredGBIF occurrence download https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.3h4zamclimate nothing to reportwikidata answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)wikipedia nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19; this build: skippedinat.taxon not askedinat.photos.wild nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)inat.photos.cultivated nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)commons nothing to reportcarried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive); that build: carried from build of 2026-09-19 (rederive)gbif.media did not answerapi.gbif.org not asked: offline re-derivationopenalex answeredcarried from build of 2026-09-19; this build: skippedEvery upstream is recorded as having answered, reported nothing, or refused. Only “nothing to report” is ever shown as an absence. Records came from 3 datasets via GBIF.org; each carries its own licence.